In 1962 the first breast implants made of silicone were used in the USA for cosmetic and curative reasons (to replace the breast after cancer operations). From the outset, these operations are associated with the risk of developing capsular fibrosis (contracture) [CC]. Depending on the degree of severity, a CC forces a new activity, and thus, the chances increase for cosmetic or surgical failure and a lasting dissatisfaction of the patient. The subsequent costs can then be a multiple of the first operation.
However, the ugly shadows of breast implants can be avoided.
Chapters:
In 2013 biofilms were agreed upon as the cause of the Capsular Contracture (C.C.)How often are C.C.s?
Other possible causes of CC - and their avoidance
The biological meaning of CC
BIA-ALCL Breast Implant-Associated - Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
The time bomb requires sustainable remediation of the patient.
The necessary measures cost money.
No implant replacement during the same operation
No surgery of the breast gland tissue during an implant insert
For the time being, no implants with a rough, textured surface.
The avoidance and causal treatment of the capsular contracture without the use of antibiotics
Antimicrobial Peptides
No Antibiotics, no Infections with a well-proven and cheap surgeon's tool
A "guarantee promise" is possible and is already given
Recommendation to the patient
In 2013 biofilms were agreed upon as the cause of the CC.
Not only breast implants but also other implants, such as artificial hip joints, pacemakers, blood vessel prostheses, and stabilizing nets (for example, hernia operations), may be affected by a contracting fibrous capsule. The common cause is the development of a biofilm around the foreign body before the natural covering - consisting of only a few cell layers - has formed. The biofilm is a strategic survival form of bacteria. The germs organize so that at least the internal living organisms last attacks from the outside, e.g., through our immune system or antibiotics. This biofilm invites our defense system unceasingly. T cells (cells of the lymphatic part of our immune system) and myofibroblasts (scarring cells, which can contract) primarily try to fight bacteria and, on the other hand, isolate our bodies from the pathogenic germs by a self-decreasing encapsulation.
The coarse capsule, which is formed instead of a natural, tender coating, contracts with time, sometimes over several years, and the inherent implant becomes as hard as a bulging balloon in its leather covering. At the latest, the patient insists on pain and ugly deformation of the breast on the liberating operation. The development of C.C. is not attributed to a mistake by the surgeon but is regarded as fatal. The patient must carry the consequences and the costs for further surgeries as a rule.
How often are C.C.s?
In scientific literature, CC occurs in up to 35% of all cases, but usually between two and ten percent. The problem sometimes arises for three months, sometimes ten years after surgery. However, most cases have occurred within the first three years. Some clinics foresee their patients the C.C. as predicted. When a CC reaches stage BAKER IV, surgery must be performed. The patient decides on the operating time.
Other possible causes of CC - and their avoidance
Factors for the development of CC:
In addition to the biofilm [1]
the postoperative blood volume in the wound bed [2]
further, the traumatization (tissue injury) during surgery [3]
To [1]:
If we use a system that promotes our wound healing and supports and supplements our organism with defending agents against bacteria, viruses, and fungi, a unique antibacterial, and active regenerative environment can be achieved during and after the operation without antibiotics thus avoiding or destroying biofilms.
The nipples harbor bacteria in the milk channels. We seal them with our defensive gel/film system before the operation. No germs can migrate into the operating area. For the same reason, no silicone implant may be used in surgical procedures that involve a surgical manipulation of the mammary gland (New Guideline of FDA).
To [2]:
With tested special kind of local anesthesia, the so-called tumescent local anesthesia, it hardly bleeds. The operation takes place almost "in the water." The delicate operation, meticulous coagulation, and insertion of drainage are tried to reduce the blood quantity to a minimum. The chemical amides in the anesthetic solution also inhibit bacteria.
To 3]:
If the operation is performed in local anesthesia, it must be carried out compassionately and gently. With these measures, the risk of developing a CC can be reduced to nearly zero percent.
The biological meaning of CC
The astounding amount of bacteria in the mass of the fibrotic capsules was published in June 2016 in a study investigating 26 patients with CC and discovered BIA-ALCL-anaplastic large-cell lymphoma associated with breast implants-a malignant tumor of the T-cell lymph system. 4.8 million bacteria were detected in only 1 milligram of tissue of a CC. In 2 grams of the fibrous capsule tissue, 2 billion more bacteria live as humans on our planet. It is a highly infectious material.
Bacterial Biofilm Infection Detected in Breast Implant-Associated - Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma]
The formation of the CC is the natural and successful attempt to keep the mass of the bacteria from the body by limiting and concentrating the place of the occurrence, reducing it as a problem zone, and isolating it. The image of the sarcophagus around the damaged reactor in Chernobyl is suggesting itself.
BIA-ALCL Breast Implant-Associated - Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
This - fortunately still - sporadic malignant T-lymphocyte tumor is connected to certain gram-negative bacteria, the so-called Ralstonia spp., in the biofilms around the implant. It occurs when capsular contracture (C.C.) is present.
It is a T-cell lymphoma. If the immune system - in this case, the T cells - is stimulated over an extended period, rare mutations can occur, forming a malignant T-cell tumor. A similar phenomenon has been known for over 30 years in malignant B-cell lymphoma in the stomach. Here, Helicobacter bacteria are triggers. In the meantime, more than 30% of all cancers are believed to be caused by bacteria.
Almost all cases of ALCL are recorded with implants with a rough, textured surface.
U.S. Epidemiology of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
In an in-depth coverage in the New York Times of May 14, 2017:
A Shocking Diagnosis: Breast Implants 'Gave Me Cancer
Three hundred fifty-nine patients with BIA-ALCL* are mentioned. The newspaper refers to data from March 2017 from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), a globally respected U.S. supervisory authority. Although there are unfortunately already deaths, the tumor is recognizable early and can then be treated well. The problem is the low level of knowledge among physicians who perform breast enlargement. Even in the U.S., where ALCL is more discussed, only 30% of plastic surgeons discuss this topic with their patients who ask for breast enlargement. In Germany, there will be much less. The tumor leads untreated to premature death. Whoever does not produce (or hardly) C.C. has the minimal prospect of ever seeing this malignant tumor in his patients. It is noteworthy that our special intraoperative measures, which support the immune defense system of the antimicrobial peptides, keep away Ralstonia spp. (and all other bacteria) from contacting the implant and destroying them during operative breast enlargement.
* [Dr. Meinking: Meanwhile, over 500 BIA ALCLs have been detected worldwide. Every year, more affected patients are recognized than the year before. As of May 1, 2018]
The time bomb requires sustainable remediation of the patient
The new knowledge and the existence of a problem solution force a new strategy in treating patients with CC, with or without BIA-ALCL. They need to be recovered sustainably before the corrective cosmetic-surgical operation can be tackled with further breast enlargement.
Therefore, if patients are asking for help because of a CC, they should be given the following clear recommendations:
1. Removal of the implants and complete removal of the fibrous capsule tissue on both sides.
2. Rinsing for at least 18 hours with a biomimetic defensin, which, in addition to its antimicrobial effect, supports nature and promotes, supplements, replaces body-borne bacterial defensive systems and triggers regenerative processes for improved wound healing. This is the core of our problem-solving method in the case of capsular fibrosis (C.C.).
3. During the operation, probes of bacteriological and fluid samples from the interior of the capsule are taken for bacterial and cytological examination (immuno-marker CD 30)
4. Sending both capsules for histological examination
5. Submitting a part of the capsular masses, disintegrated in the cleanroom laboratory for bacteriological examination
6. Collection of blood samples for the determination of inflammatory factors, among other things.
7. Wait at least three months, better six months, and check the inflammatory markers
8. Decision-making on new, breast-enhancing measures. These can either be own-fat transfer (best method after CC) or the insertion of implants under an antibiotic-free, natural defense imitating regime. Both ways, i.e., silicone implants or the own-fat transfer, can be carried out in local anesthesia, without general anesthesia.
This procedure leads to eradicating germs and drastic reduction of ALCL tumor cells, if existent, from the implant pocket and the fibrosis tissue. The verification of the CC is performed, and hopefully, no tumor is detected. In the case of exposed tumor cells, specific cytostatic or irradiation therapy must be carried out. The treatment of BIA-ALCL has a good prognosis. The microbiome (the grouping of the bacteria in the CC tissue) is also recorded. Besides, the inflammatory status is established. It can be assessed in the course of the process as a follow-up.
Thus, the optimal time for the final cosmetic surgery can be agreed upon. Everything serves the patient's safety and their ultimate satisfaction. Antibiotics can be dispensed with during even these surgical procedures.
The necessary measures cost money.
The costs for the entire procedure - recovery of the implant bag of CC and bacteria plus renewed breast enlargement - including two operations with inpatient care, all examinations in different laboratories and the pathological institute, new implants, and their insertion, are in the five-digit range. They are perhaps only partly taken over by the health insurance companies.
In the case of the desired breast enlargement with prepared own adipose tissue must be calculated individually.
No implant replacement during the same operation
Patients are not advised to undergo a direct implant replacement (in the same surgical session), even if the new implants are placed in a different site.
Likewise, implant removal combined with a direct own-fat transfer is discouraged, even if successfully offered. First, germ-freeness must be established. It is known that biofilms and the following tissue growths can develop during internal bacterial loading also at inner wound interfaces - they occur in the case of fat transfer or the point of the implant insertion. The up-to-10-fold repetition of a CC in surgery, where implants are changed during the same operative session, is scientifically proven.
No surgery of the breast gland tissue during an implant insert
Corresponding to the statements made in the previous section, the simultaneous reduction/silicon-implant technique, which is still frequently performed, with enlargement of the breasts by implants during a single operation (reduction-mastopexy with implant insert), is to be dispensed with. This procedure is divided into two operative steps since bacteria from the glandular tissue (milk channels) can colonize the implant and form a biofilm.
According to more recent findings, a better one uses an own-fat tissue transfer for the last enlargement.
The operative access through the areola should be avoided for the same reasons in the future, also. These indications come from an international group of recognized breast surgeons and are available in the new guidelines of the FDA.
For the time being, no implants with a rough, textured surface
The malignant tumor ALCL has almost occurred only with implants with a rough, textured surface.
Breast implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand - high surface area textured implants are associated with increased risk.
As a result, drop-shaped, so-called "anatomical" implants are inevitably omitted. Smooth-walled, drop-shaped implants could "turn" after the operation, and the "squinting" of the nipples would occur. The new findings, therefore, force the use of smooth, round implants. For the most part, they are always used in the USA. In Germany, they are still significantly below five percent of all implants used. The number increases slowly. In the Medical Well Clinic Dresden, round and smooth implants are inserted.
The avoidance and causal treatment of the capsular contracture without the use of antibiotics
We have accumulated experience with an active, non-toxic, biomimetic defensive system for over 20 years. Innate defense mechanism against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa is used and strengthened (see below: antimicrobial peptides). In more than 9,000 operations in a series, we have seen no primary infection of the operating area. No biofilm and no CC are produced. With this knowledge, the strategy for recovery from all pathogenetic causes and effects that lead to capsular contracture is also plausible and promising. A solution to the problem can be offered with the sustained remediation of the patient without antibiotics.
The rehabilitation concept involves two operations. Following our idea of supporting the innate immune system, no antibiotics are used in implant and capsule removal and elective corrective surgery. The pressure for developing bacterial resistance to antibiotics is thus avoided. The patient's bacterial flora (his microbiome) remains unaffected, and the wound healing is not disturbed by the cytotoxic and general side-effects of antibiotics.
Antimicrobial Peptides
Probably since the end of the nineteenth century, and at the latest since 1922, when Alexander Fleming, six years before he discovered the penicillin, fell a drop of the snotty nose into the bacterial culture, and a few hours later he noticed an inhibiting court around the bacteria: Antimicrobial Peptides [AMP] were detected. He called the substance LYSOZYME. Of the more than 1,500 discovered antimicrobial peptides from the entire plant and animal kingdom (probably trillions thereof), more than thousand work well according to a particular principle: hydrophobic and cationic surface structures take the negatively charged bacterial membrane into their chemical forceps and crack it (polycationic peptides). The biomimetic defensin we make use of imitates these thousand. The death of the bacteria is fast, with no time for developing resistance or taking steps against it. Other cells, particularly mammalian cells, do not provide the AMPs with this attack surface. They do not harm man; they protect him.
The existence of antimicrobial peptides goes back to the beginnings of life more than 3 billion years ago. Like basic chemical and physical principles, they are part of the basis for developing other life forms. AMPs are found everywhere where bacterial stresses occur physiologically or pathogenically and protect, for example, the oral cavity and the intestines from infectious self-destruction. Our highly developed immune system, which reacts much slower, has grown in interaction with the AMP mechanism. Genetic disorders of this system lead to diseases such as eczema or Morbus Chron. AMPs are always present, are the first to present and send signals to the immune system. Such signals trigger anti-infective but also regenerative actions.
No Antibiotics, no Infections with a well-proven and cheap surgeon's tool
Anyone who uses this system as a surgeon can altogether dispense with antibiotics and still does not see any operations-related infections. We look back on the active support of the AMPs in any extra-fascial surgery for 21 years. Since 2006, our clinic has no longer used antibiotics.
The catastrophic situation resulting from multi-resistant microorganisms puts the AMP as a source of hope for developing new antimicrobials in research interests.
A "guarantee promise" is possible and is already given
The co-operation of the described antimicrobial measures means that we hardly see "own" C.C.; only one in 2002. Therefore, in the Medical Well Clinic Dresden since July 2016, the promise has been made until further notice, if a histologically confirmed capsular contracture (BAKER stage IV) occurs within three years after a breast enlargement in our clinic with implants, necessary surgical procedures including anesthesia, new implants (if desired), all examinations by other institutes, hospital care, and after-treatment. The promise corresponds to a counter value in a five-digit range.
Some patient inherent risk factors must be excluded.
Recommendation to the patient
Ask your surgeon how they intend to avoid capsular contracture. How do they behave? Should a CC develop? If they think that a CC cannot be prevented, or only with massive intraoperative irrigation with a solution of several antibiotics, then you know - provided you have read so far - something more.
Dresden, in August 2017
Dr. med. Michael Meinking
Head of the Medical Well Clinic Dresden
An alternate title for this essay: A clinic, free of infection, without antibiotics - how is that possible?
Links:
Labels: AMP, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, antimicrobial peptide, BIA-ALCL, biomimetic defensin, breast augmentation, breast cancer by implants, breast implants, cancer by breast implants, capsular contracture
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen